Total Members Voted: 114
Voting closed: February 02, 2013, 08:07:39 pm
I would prefer EHAM / Amsterdam Schiphol. I've found out the beauty of CYVR's very little frame impact and i would love to have that kind of frames on EHAM with the great 3D modeling skills of FSDT in stead of the slow, rather ugly scenery from Aerosoft.
It looks like FlyTampa is not going to be doing the reboot of KSEA, and George said he might do YSSY. That is some good news.
Quote from: CX 747-400 on January 24, 2013, 09:33:40 pmIt looks like FlyTampa is not going to be doing the reboot of KSEA, and George said he might do YSSY. That is some good news. **********PLEASE....PLEASE.....Do ..... SEATTLE ~ KSEA****It is way OVER DUE .... since George is Abanding thatAirport ...which the Old Fly Tampa Version WILL NOT WORK ...for FSX...
Quote from: akair-NorthLinkVA on January 27, 2013, 08:59:14 pmQuote from: CX 747-400 on January 24, 2013, 09:33:40 pmIt looks like FlyTampa is not going to be doing the reboot of KSEA, and George said he might do YSSY. That is some good news. **********PLEASE....PLEASE.....Do ..... SEATTLE ~ KSEA****It is way OVER DUE .... since George is Abanding thatAirport ...which the Old Fly Tampa Version WILL NOT WORK ...for FSX...No, that's stupid.So there are like 15,000 airports that need to be 'redone' or 'did' in FSX. Why don't we let Virtuali CHOOSE NOW.
You know, we all agree we need a new flight sim. Can't we all setup a kickstarter and all contribute to start it up?