I take particular issue with the updater which is a terrible piece of software in my mind.
The updater works perfectly fine, because it does what it's supposed to do: update all products to the latest version.
Its only "problem" is that is very transparent about what it does, meaning if there's any issue with the servers not updated, it will *tell* the file should have been downloaded, but for some reason the current version didn't arrive, it will try to download it again, so you think the updater has a "problem", when in fact it's only doing his job, correctly detecting the file you downloaded is not the same we have online, so it will try to download it again on the next run.
If we "cheated", we could just remove all this extra log information, replace it with a "version number", so you would happy assuming you have the latest version ("I see a version number, so I'm fine" ), when in fact you really don't, and you wouldn't even suspect there might have been a problem and not *all* your files are fine.
Instead, with the reliable method we have here, if there's a problem with your local nodes, you KNOW, because you see the same files are downloaded over and over, so you KNOW you should use the alternative Offline installer.
But I guess being cheated on is something that makes the software more "intuitive": all these comments seems to indicate nobody is really interested in fault tolerance and reliability, you only want a software that works like all the others, with a familiar version number. Noted for future updates...