When I pull up STL, the GSX Airport Editor shows all the bridges as assigned to airline logos such as TWA, United, etc as seen in the screenshots...BUT it does NOT show these logos!
You posted lots of screenshots, except the only one that mattered: the one showing you HAVE assigned the jetway logo in the proper place, that is the Jetway tab of the editor.
Please, I've had tons of problems with GSX and the support I've gotten has been very crappy to be honest lol, almost NONE of the things I've brought up have been solved at all...
I don't know what you are referring to but, checking your previous posts, the "tons" of problems you ever reported where:
- A problem with some conflicts caused by other sceneries, which you have been clearly explained, somebody told you to check OrbX, you never came back to report. Nothing that has anything to do with GSX in this case.
- A problem with SODE jetways, that nobody ever reported before, which turned out to be your attempt to make a mix-up between SODE/non-SODE jetways on the same airport and again, you were given some suggestions, for something that wasn't obviously a GSX issue to begin with.
for a commercial product. I still don't understand why like 50% of the time SODE works on user and AI aircraft with the GSX bridges and 50% of the time it does not tho all other SODE bridges not made by GSX works, for example...
Fact you don't undersand it, doesn't automatically mean it's a "GSX issue". When you use a 3rd party airport that comes with its own SODE jetways, the developer usually have carefully selected the jetway model and its position, ensuing it would work on his scenery. This, at least, is what developers should do, because it's their jetways working over their scenery.
If with "GSX jetways", you mean Jetways that are
automatically replaced by GSX, it's NORMAL they won't "just work", because when GSX automatically replaces jetways, which will ONLY happen on default airports, it will use a model that MUST be dimensionally identical to the default model, otherwise it won't match the airport buildings. But since it uses the SODE system, you can't be 100% sure that a SODE jetway that has the same dimensions of the default one would work in the same place, with the same relationship to the original parking as the default.
This because FSX/P3D are "cheating" with jetways: they are allowed to overextend and break up, so you "think" they might work "better", but that's only because they don't respect the real constraint a jetway would have in the real world.
But again, this is only the DEFAULT replacement model, which is only ONE of the 85+ different models supplied with GSX.
Which you are supposed to CHOOSE and TEST, to find the better model that would suit that particular parking stand. Jetways are ordered depending on the gate and, while it would be nice if there were an "universal" model that would always work from every position on every airplane (it would be very popular if it existed), when you raise the realism, you encounter the same restrictions as in real life, where jetways are available in many different sizes for a reason.
That's the first part of the "issue" ( which is not even an issue ). The other problem is, GSX adds (or, more precisely, allow you to add ) extra informations about a parking that are simply not available for the AI system, since they are outside the AFCAD.
The most important one is the "Stop Position", which is separate from the Parking center (which can also be customized independently from the AFCAD ), which takes into account other extra data not available to the sim ( hence the AI ), like the concept of the "Preferred Exit". This allows users to optimize a GSX profile to work MUCH better for the user airplane but, all of this extra data can't be used by the AI so, even if you test the jetways with the airplane parked in the correct position, related to the Preferred Exit, the AI will continue to park according only to the data AFCAD so, a GSX profile carefully optimized for the user, might not work as well with AI. But it will work MUCH better for the user.
but just like this post people just jump to responses without addressing the actual complaint and nothing gets solved.
The reality, of course, is exactly the opposite of what you are trying to say here because, instead, everything is always solved, provided is reported accurately and the issue can be reproduced ( meaning, it's real )
So, please provide some solid and accurate evidence that "jetways logos do not save", and we'll try to understand what's happening.
