As nothing on the advertising in Simmarket or on your website had changed regarding system or installation requirements prior to the weekend, l made the purchases in good faith based on FSDreamTeam and Simmarket website product specification requirements advertised, as the trials of both airports had previously worked without issue on my system which has not changed. So l have done what you stated l needed to do, ie trial the products on my system.
This is just wrong. We haven't changed the INSTALL requirements "this weekend". We changed the website *description* for requirements only, but the INSTALLER required P3D 4.4 long before that. We changed it sometime in July 2019, see here for proof:
July 2019:
http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,21470.msg146008.html#msg146008http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,21567.msg146530.html#msg146530http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,21137.msg144921.html#msg144921Following my raising the Ticket and writing a new Topic on the forum highlighting the issue, Simmarket and FSDreamTeam has been quick to correct the error in the system requirements of FSDreamTeam products over the weekend. l congratulate you on such a rapid response once you were made aware of the advertising error. But as you are also aware, this correction is well after my purchase of the last two airports.
Wrong again, we changed it because we had to remove Windows 7 from the supported OS, so we waited the day of the official end-of-life for it, to update all descriptions, your support request didn't had anything to do with this, it was just a coincidence you bought exactly at the same time we were updating the descriptions for THAT reason.
Not that this is makes any difference, since as I've said, the TRIAL version doesn't install in P3D 4.2 since LAST YEAR.
P3Dv4.4 update is not an option for me. Sadly, based on the forum reports, and speaking directly with others who have updated esp those with ProSim737, it would require reinstalling many of my add-ons, and take a significant amount of time to get my system back to its current state of operation. Even Melbourne737 who is local and has the same system as mine with ProSim737 described it on his Facebook page as time consuming, tedious and exhausting, and something he would not want to do again.
You are based what you "read on forums". I'm telling you this is not the case so, what evidence you have that what you are reading on *this* forum is any less correct that what you read elsewhere ? That you have to reinstall everything, only to update from 4.2 to 4.5, is simply NOT true.
And PBR would overstretch my system so the suggestion that l am “not in my right mind” for not wanting to update to PBR is extremely unfair.
Who told you PBR is surely slower that Legacy ? We don't have any evidence of that.
There are many of us using Prosim737 with projector systems not updating from 4.1/4.2/4.3 due to the amount of work involved and the system requirements to run PBR. And if you are not aware, many companies still strongly support all versions of P3Dv4 with their old and many of their new products including Orbx, JustSim, Drzeweiki, Digital Designs, Flightbeam, UK2000 to name just a few of the many.
Wrong comparison. Simple sceneries which didn't use PBR could possibly be left as they were, but since almost all our sceneries use and requires GSX to work, they will inherit GSX software requirements, and GSX is now almost entirely PBR, and use the native P3D 4.4 SDK so, there's no way to go back to the old versions, once GSX is updated.
And, in addition to that, we had to update the software anyway to support the new activation system, because of the Esellerate closure, and there's no way we would be able to retrofit the old version of the software to support the new activation JUST to support an older P3D.
And, the only version of P3D V2 supported is 2.5, and the only version of P3D3 supported is 3.4, we are even being more flexible, since we support 4.4 and 4.5, but that won't last very long, since there *are* extra features in the 4.5 SDK we might need.
Simmarket has agreed to credit my account for the two airports if they receive an email from FSDreamTeam. Based on my strong support of FSDreamTeam with 13 previous product purchases, I hope you be fair and will email Simmarket and give them permission to recredit my account for these two latest airport purchases (Louisville & Zurich) as well as Geneva that l can no longer use.
No, of course we won't agree to this, because if you really tried the Trial, it would be obvious you couldn't install under 4.2, so you could choose not to purchase. As I've said, the Trial cannot install in anything lower than 4.4 and it has been like this for months.
But that's beside the point, the main this here is that you SHOULD update, and it's just wrong not wanting to, based on inaccurate/outdated information you might have.
As I've said, updating usually requires to update BOTH the Client and the Content, even if I always update using the full installer, and never had to reinstall any add-on. If you have a particular add-on that would force you to reinstall it when you update the simulator, you should complain to THAT developer that is forcing you and it's preventing to get all the latest fixes from Lockheed Martin which, going from 4.2 to 4.5 HF2 were A LOT.