GSX not asking for amount of Pax when deboarding

[iMove Quick]

Hi there,

I noticed today when I arrived at the gate and selected deboarding it's start deboarding straight away, without asking how many passengers I want to deboard.

Boarding: Just fine, it still ask, because I disabled the setting for it.
Deboarding: Starts deboarding without asking how many pax.

Thanks!

~iMoveQuick

EDIT: Or this a new feature, that it deboards the amount of pax that it boarded?

[virtuali]

Are you reporting this as a bug ? It's an improvement, which has been suggested by a user:

http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,21784.msg147997.html#msg147997

On a related issue why do I need to tell GSX the number of pax on deboarding when I have already entered the number when boarding? Is it reasonable to assume no virtual passengers have been thrown off the flight for bad behaviour?

And, of course, we listened and added on the first update.

[Timothy Metzinger]

Are you reporting this as a bug ? It's an improvement, which has been suggested by a user:

http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,21784.msg147997.html#msg147997

On a related issue why do I need to tell GSX the number of pax on deboarding when I have already entered the number when boarding? Is it reasonable to assume no virtual passengers have been thrown off the flight for bad behaviour?

And, of course, we listened and added on the first update.

Well, I didn't see it until 2.7, and it wasn't in the release notes that I saw so it was welcome, if unexpected, behavior.

[iMove Quick]

Are you reporting this as a bug ? It's an improvement, which has been suggested by a user:

http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,21784.msg147997.html#msg147997

On a related issue why do I need to tell GSX the number of pax on deboarding when I have already entered the number when boarding? Is it reasonable to assume no virtual passengers have been thrown off the flight for bad behaviour?

And, of course, we listened and added on the first update.

Sorry, I've edited the post 2 seconds later! My bad!

Thanks

Well, I didn't see it until 2.7, and it wasn't in the release notes that I saw so it was welcome, if unexpected, behavior.