the WHOLE point we are talking about on these sceneries from different developers is making them optimized for AI traffic.
This sentence doesn't make any sense. There's no such thing as a scenery "optimized for AI traffic", if you mean performance-wise. The only thing a scenery developer can do, is try to optimized the scenery as best he can, hoping the AI traffic product wouldn't slow it down too much, and users would use realistic density settings, which are there for a reason.
NOBODY wants to fly into a KLAX, KFJK, KBOS for example with HIGH FPS & ZERO freakin AI traffic. We want these PAID sceneries that we are being told are performance friendly/optimized ….when they are not when u add 10 AI aircraft to the scenery. Nobody wants 80 gates at KLAX , with 3 ai aircraft and hitting 25 fps.
I already proven this is not what's happening, when I posted my screenshot showing a lot
I have 60 AI aircraft at Flightbeam KSFO or Flightbeam KDEN or Flytampa Toronto and have 65 FPS using the Pmdg 777 or TFDI 717. this is the entire topic of the conversation
You keep missing the point. Is there a scenery for the KLAX area that can run the PMDG 777 at 65 fps ? Until that happens, you can't simply compare.
Than Show me your FPS numbers in top left hand corner (Shift+Z )
I ALREADY posted a screenshot with PMDG 737 and AI aircraft, I had 33.8 fps, which I find very good, considering I have a fairly old CPU ( 4 years old i7-6700 ) and I don't use any overclocking.
Instead, why you don't do this ?
- See the fps at DEFAULT KLAX ( you said you uninstalled, that should be easy )
- See the fps difference at FSDT KLAX.
Than decide, if the fps hit is worth the difference in detail. I hope you don't expect FSDT KLAX to *improve* on default, that would be unreasonable.
PS.....Been hearing your new KORD is dragging on FPS too. That's coming from me reading numerous sites, not MY OPINION ONLY
It obviously isn't, and it's funny you are trying to prove your point by only citing reports on bad fps. You can find "bad fps" reports for ALL the scenery you said run at 65 fps on your system, if you search. So, together with those supposedly bad fps report on KORD, it's very easy to find many reports of good fps as well.