So, dosent it make more sense first to implement a GPU then this Bat Loader you added?
It obviously make more sense to add a battery charger feature to our SODE jetways, which are the main feature of the Level 2 expansion, and it's something that could be added easily, because the power unit is ALREADY THERE, without having to create a new kind of service vehicle, with its own customization options, paths, attach points on the airplane that must customized too, etc.
]I know a lot of pilots who does not install the sode gateways because it makes to much work to setup them all.
That's precisely the reason why we wanted to show yet another benefit of using them. Of course, those using default airports already have the jetways automatically replaced.
Also in the last disussion you told me that it is not possible because a GPU can not work as a bat loader. But now it is possible with your Gateway bat loader 
hmm....
That's not what I said. I said we must be careful touching 3rd party airplanes systems, since by default, a GPU doesn't exists. And, in fact, the batter charger DOES NOT charge anything, if the airplane is flagged as having a custom electrical system, and this won't change even when we'll have a separate GPU *vehicle*.
