Developer's Backdoor > Chicago O'Hare V2
Preview2
Alessandro:
.
Hnla:
Why is it in 2018 with P3D V4.2 with 64-bit technology that we still have barren tarmacs, with hardly any service vehicles. One would think this would be a scene of an abandoned airport.
KMEM was the only airport ever released that had a realistic number of tarmac vehicles, people, and the representation of a "crowded gate". However this was not present in any other airport. Why??
F737NG:
--- Quote from: Hnla on April 16, 2018, 11:04:19 pm ---Why is it in 2018 with P3D V4.2 with 64-bit technology that we still have barren tarmacs, with hardly any service vehicles. One would think this would be a scene of an abandoned airport.
KMEM was the only airport ever released that had a realistic number of tarmac vehicles, people, and the representation of a "crowded gate". However this was not present in any other airport. Why??
--- End quote ---
The reason for a lack of tarmac vehicles is given in the first sentence of this post.
http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php/topic,15673.msg112789.html#msg112789
I also think it is to avoid extra PC resource usage when approaching / at a large, detailed airport and with probably a lot of AI traffic also displayed.
Can you imagine the number of complaints from simmers suffering stutters when near a large, detailed airport which has "crowded gates"?
No developer needs that aggravation from customers.
jbcallender:
Will it have the correct runways, currently numbered?
Jeff Callender
Anders Bermann:
--- Quote from: jbcallender on April 17, 2018, 05:44:03 am ---Will it have the correct runways, currently numbered?
Jeff Callender
--- End quote ---
Sorry for answering so blunt - but... what do you think? :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version