Guys how is KEWR coming along?

[alexzar14]

3 KEWRs there but all of them are hazaraish (

[Bruce Hamilton]

I don't think a fourth is in their plans... Charlotte and Louisville are confirmed, and possibly Baltimore-Washington?

[Lude2Envy]

We need KATL from someone other than Imagine Sim!!!

[Bruce Hamilton]

Isn't that like saying we need KMEM from someone other than FSDT?

[Hnla]

Isn't that like saying we need KMEM from someone other than FSDT?

No. Saying FSDT's quality is the same to Imaginesim is a huge insult to FSDT

[Bruce Hamilton]

No. Saying FSDT's quality is the same to Imaginesim is a huge insult to FSDT

My point is that we don't need more than one copy of any scenery. IS is far and away better than some others.

[Hnla]

My point is that we don't need more than one copy of any scenery.

This is a ridiculous statement.

Are you REALLY saying you would be fine with ImagineSim Denver's scenery from 2011 instead of Flightbeam KDEN??   

[Bruce Hamilton]

Are you REALLY saying you would be fine with ImagineSim Denver's scenery from 2011 instead of Flightbeam KDEN??   

Stop twisting my comments around, obviously when there are multiple options, I would go for the higher quality version.  Case in point, I was satisfied with Blueprint's Dulles... IS did a better version, I moved up... FB did an even better version, I moved up.  Atlanta is a brand new release, there are still many airports not done or seriously old that would benefit us more than another Atlanta.

[alexzar14]

updating older airports KORD and KLAS does make best sense, nevertheless that KEWR that was just released on simmarket, is a classic case of robbery.

[Bruce Hamilton]

And yet it's #8 on the bestseller list for the week.  Screenshots make Blueprint look good.   

[Hnla]

Screenshots make Blueprint look good.

Wrong, nothing makes blueprint look good

[Lude2Envy]

Isn't that like saying we need KMEM from someone other than FSDT?

Imagine Sim isn't on the same playing field as FSDT, FlightBeam, or FlyTampa. If I'm spending $33 on a scenery, it better be up to par with these three developers.

[Bruce Hamilton]

I certainly don't think FlyTampa is on the same playing field as Flightbeam and Dreamteam, but have you ever even owned an Imaginesim scenery?

[VitaminA330]

For example I had installed ImagineSim's demo version of KATL in order to test its performance. And that was exactly the problem: Got an OOM on the first flight to KATL. Well now you can say: OK, the PMDG777 needs a lot of VAS, as well as AI traffic. But at the big FSDT and FB (and also FlyTampa) airports it works. ImagineSim's Atlanta doesn't look bad at all, but at airports of this size you can see that they hardly work without the abilities the addon manager has - creating and destroying objects on demand. Same thing with Aerosoft's Frankfurt. They always claim they did so many compromises in favour of a better performance (while looking ...well at least OK). But it's still way worse than for example KDFW or even KLAX, even without an ORBX full fat region around it. All this in Prepar3D v3.2 - remember that in FSX VAS problems are a lot worse. All that prevented me so far from buying KATL. Was there an FSDT version I wouldn't hesitate to buy it.

Regards, Dominik

[Lude2Envy]

I certainly don't think FlyTampa is on the same playing field as Flightbeam and Dreamteam, but have you ever even owned an Imaginesim scenery?

How can you say FlyTampa is not on the same playing field as them? That's asinine. I have World Airports 3 and 4 on FSX which combine for 9 Imagine Sim sceneries. They're better than default, but still not that good. They're mid-level at best like Latin VFR. Taxi2Gate is better than Imagine Sim also.