KATL Atlanta International

[Pascalino]

Dear all,

it is planed to create the Atlanta international Airport too ? it will be very nice if you can create such these world wide greatest Airport for us enthusiast....

Best regards

Pascal

[HB-HFK]

Hello Pascal,

You don't like this one?

http://www.imaginesim.com/

[kyle joseph]

Hello Pascal,

You don't like this one?

http://www.imaginesim.com/

yea, that atlanta is good enough for me...

[Pascalino]

Hi,

yes I´ve heard about the imaginesim-Scenery. But I belive that the FSdreamteam -goup will be more successfull to do this job by better textures and so on....


But I will give imaginesim a try. There is a possibility to test the scenery by a demo.

But I am looking forward if the fsdreamteam-group will develop this scenery....

regards

Pascal

[kyle joseph]

they probably will not do the scenery as it has been done already, and recently

2. that scenery also has AES support, and many of the things us (fs9) users hold dear


3. fsdreamteam works on projects that make economic sense, and redoing Atlanta, another 2008 release, just doesn't

[Silverbird]

If you would like to try there scenery's for fsx and fs9 they have demos in there website and I believe it wouldn't be fair to make other katl and I'm sure out of respect fsdt wouldn't do that. but I can totally understand that you like fsdt work very much.

[Bruce Hamilton]

...I believe it wouldn't be fair to make other katl...

You're joking, right?  Imaginesim is about to release KIAD, which has already been done by Blueprint, who are working on KORD, which has already been done by FSDT. Their only conflict of interest would be doing scenery already done by C9.

[Silverbird]

...I believe it wouldn't be fair to make other katl...

You're joking, right?  Imaginesim is about to release KIAD, which has already been done by Blueprint, who are working on KORD, which has already been done by FSDT. Their only conflict of interest would be doing scenery already done by C9.

HI Bruce That's true they did do KIAD which was already done by blueprint, but I think quality wise the imaginesim is fine, it just doesn't make sense to me for fsdt to do this airport that has already been recently done. there are of course so many airports to be made in fs. one thing about blueprint is that they don't provide aes support or have custom ground work.

[thepilot]

...I believe it wouldn't be fair to make other katl...

You're joking, right?  Imaginesim is about to release KIAD, which has already been done by Blueprint, who are working on KORD, which has already been done by FSDT. Their only conflict of interest would be doing scenery already done by C9.

I wouldn't actually consider Blueprint's stuff as 'sceneries'...

[SirIsaac726]

...I believe it wouldn't be fair to make other katl...

You're joking, right?  Imaginesim is about to release KIAD, which has already been done by Blueprint, who are working on KORD, which has already been done by FSDT. Their only conflict of interest would be doing scenery already done by C9.

Bruce,

You are absolutely right that both made KIAD but to compare it to both ImagineSim and FSDT doing a KATL is much different than BluePrint and ImagineSim.  The difference is ImagineSim (IS) and FSDT both go for the high quality sceneries.  BluePrint on the other hand, is trying to appeal to a different crowd of simmers with less detailed sceneries that cost less.  I'm not saying anything bad about BluePrint (although I am extremely mad at them as a company...whole other story that doesn't relate to their actual sceneries and scenery quality) but they try to appeal to different simmers than IS and FSDT.  So IS doing a KIAD after BluePrint doing a KIAD seems perfectly fine to me while as others said, why should FSDT make a KATL when IS has a high quality one.

[Bruce Hamilton]

...it just doesn't make sense to me for fsdt to do this airport that has already been recently done.

I agree that it doesn't make sense, but your previous comment was that it wouldn't be fair... There is no such thing as fair when your in business.

[Rafal]

IS has a high quality one.

Probably a question of taste.
I was planing to buy a few airports ImagineSim have made but after seeing their promotional screenshots I gave up this idea.
I guess I'm just spoiled with the quality offerings from FSDT, FlyTampa, FlightScenery or Aerosoft (some).
I don't like this KIAD either. Of course I'm only judging with my eyes, but eyes are decision makers if it comes to buying sceneries.

Just my 2 cents.

Best regards,
Rafal

[Lude2Envy]

I agree......you can't compare imagine sim to blueprint.... and KATL from imagine sim is excellent. Very well done.....so is San Juan.

[mackintosh]

I guess I'm just spoiled with the quality offerings from FSDT, FlyTampa, FlightScenery or Aerosoft (some).
I don't like this KIAD either. Of course I'm only judging with my eyes, but eyes are decision makers if it comes to buying sceneries.

Quite right. KIAD is not as well designed and polished as KATL is, lacking the eyecandy and integration with surrounding area. While I think we are all spoiled by high quality scenery, I am a firm believer that at the very least, each designer's new scenery should be an improvement over the previous one. KIAD, sadly, is not, in fact, it takes a step back.

[Bruce Hamilton]

...I am a firm believer that at the very least, each designer's new scenery should be an improvement over the previous one.

If that's the case, you must have some seriously high expectations for Geneva.