I think you are having some difficulty understanding what I am saying
I understood exactly what I said.
Nobody was looking for support help at that point, they just wanted to see if others had a similar experience.
Well, they should have. That's was my point, very simple. It's no use discussing on problems in other places, and don't report them here. Doing this, won't have any effect to the chance of them being fixed.
You asked me to go into the customize airport or whatever it is called to see what Afcads that GSX is using. This is the third time I am trying to tell you that it is using My Traffic 6 afcads
It wasn't entirely clear from you LAST message, when you finally included a precise report, for the fist time. I also said I *assumed* you are STILL using the MyTraffic AFCAD, even in this specific airport, during that specific session.
Why GSX picked the My traffic scenery to use, rather than one of the others, I have no idea
Now it's YOU that have some difficulty understanding what I am saying, so I'll repeat it again: GSX COMPLIES with the layering ordering in the Scenery Library, and will take the AFCAD for that airport which is higher than in the list.
Which means: if GSX has taken the MyTraffic AFCAD for that airport, it means you don't have other AFCADs for the SAME airport, on a higher layer in the Scenery Library. And this is ENTIRELY NORMAL and CORRECT. Unless, you are saying you KNOW you have another (better) AFCAD on an higher layer, and are wondering why GSX hasn't picked up that one instead.
Again, I assuming my replies based on your reports. You said you have just UTX and everything else is default. UTX doesn't contain any AFCADs (at least as far as I know) so, there's no reason to think GSX shouldn't have picked the MyTraffic AFCADs, since they are (usually) installed on an HIGHER layer compared to the default ones.
But as I've said, fact that GSX has picked the AFCAD it SHOULD have picked, doesn't automatically guaranteed this AFCAD is fine. But as I also said in my previous reply, before saying the AFCAD has a bug, it must be checked.
All I know is that prior to the update 2 weeks ago, I did not have this problem. Prior to the update 2 weeks ago the follow me car never got lost , never ran around in circles, and never just disappeared. Now it does.
But you still haven't done what I asked to do in my previous message. Since I said that before saying the AFCAD has a bug, it must be checked, I asked to send me the AFCAD that was active for the session related to your previous report, so we can REPLICATE your actions, and verify if the problem is the AFCAD, or it's a problem in the Follow Me code that has issue to conform to something that is formally correct in the AFCAD, but possibly unusual (like too many nodes very close to each other, for example)
So, again, as I've said in my previous message, I awaiting for the file, either by email or PM.