I didnt blame the AV. I said I did as you suggested when I install your sceneries.
But YOU said it worked ONLY after you did that. Never happened to me with the MS Windows Defender, but what reasons do I have not to believe your report ? If disabling the antivirus fixed your issue, what is the problem, exactly ?
You are the one that said to disable AV and have the AV exclude certain files before we start installing.
That's what you have to do if the antivirus is the source of the problem. What do you think the exclusions are there for ? Because antivirus vendors KNOW they can catch false positives.
Its clear if we have to do that, then coualt is doing something to make all AV think its a virus. I've never had to do that with any other scenery and I have plenty.
Couatl is not a scenery, so it's wrong to compare it with a scenery, it's a support program used by GSX and sceneries too, and it should be compared to something like the Flight1 module, with the difference that while the Flight1 wrapper module does ONLY anti-piracy protection, while 99% of Couatl does is totally unrelated to anti-piracy: it's a Python interpreter to allow scripting to allow any kind of interaction with objects ( GSX is written 100% in Python ), which saves a lot of valuable memory, by running externally from FSX, and it might resemble some an utility module like FSUIPC.
Guess what, if you Google for "antivirus" and "Flight1 wrapper", you'll see PLENTY of similar issues with antivirus products. ANY FSX module that has any reasons to use cryptography (would you trust a module that handles your personal details when ordering products if IT DIDN'T ? ), will be red-flagged by antivirus.
And the reason is very simple: when a module is encrypted against any tampering, the antivirus CANNOT "peek" inside it, to check if it's REALLY dangerous, because that's the whole point of being encrypted against any tampering. So, to err on the safe side, the very fact of being encrypted against any tampering is considered enough proof to report a virus, because the antivirus CANNOT tell the difference, since it cannot look inside the executable.
WHICH IS WHY, the Taggant system has been proposed, to allow legit authors to digitally sign their executables to be recognized as safe and still being able to use encryption against tampering, which is becoming mandatory for any executable that has to deal in *some* way with users private data.
WHICH IS WHY, we immediately adopted the Taggant system, but we cannot be sure how fast all antivirus will recognize it, because the first commercial working implementations of it has been released quite recently.
And how is installing some updates able to trigger a reactivation from your sceneries and not others.
Because our sceneries ( and FB ) use Esellerate, and not others. Besides, you still haven't replied to my request (in private) to send me a list of all your past orders, so I could check your activations and when/how they happened. As I've said, I couldn't find any other orders for FSDT sceneries other than KIAH so, I wonder if with "all my FSDT sceneries" you meant JUST KIAH, or you have other orders, maybe made under a different name or email.
And no, I'm not asking this to question your report, but ONLY to see when those reactivations happened, and eventually add new ones. I ALREADY did that for GSX and KIAH (the only order I could find), so you have several spare activations left so, if you have other sceneries, it's in your best interest to say which ones, and their order numbers, so all their activations could be verified and added if you need new ones.
Maybe you need to work on that part of the program because installing a few updates in the background shouldnt trigger a reactivation.
We don't have to work on anything, because we don't have any control of how what Windows drivers say to Esellerate, which is doing all the hardware detection. It anyone had to work on this, it should be Esellerate, but since their .DLL is used by hundreds of products, even unrelated to flightsim or games, if this was really a common issue, they would have fixed it long ago.
You're basically saying that everytime windows installs updates the reactivation script will be triggered which is unacceptable.
YOU said "it worked for years". Are you saying you never, ever, installed any Windows updates before ? Surely that's not the case, so you already have proof that, normally, installing updates will not cause any problems.
But apparently, SOME of the updates that has been published these days, caused this problem, on YOUR system. Perhaps it was simply the timing of the installation of the updates, otherwise it would have happened to everybody.
And I've posted a video showing the unresponsive menus that I and others are having. It seems like you cant reproduce none of the problems that people report. Maybe because you are working in a controlled environment
And I've I ASKED you to be able to check your system directly with Teamviewer, so I can run some test on YOUR system. To this request, you still haven't replied.
This clearly demonstrates that, when a real problem is found, we are trying everything to fix it, but since we cannot reproduce it, we NEED your help. But this is a real problem, the activation issue you had, IT'S NOT.