I am really not excited about KATL. It has been done by so many in the past because it is so simple. It is mainly a group of blocks (terminals) abreast one another.
What? The only payware for it is a low end version from Imaginesim for FSX. That's it. Before that way way way back was one done for FS2000 from Simflyers. Who incidentally was the group that gave birth to Imaginesim. "So many" as you put it is not true in any form or fashion.
I don't understand why some people seemingly have a "chip on their shoulder". "
Not true in any form or fashion" as you stated is incorrect. If you read what I wrote, I made no specific reference to a particular version of Microsoft Flightsim. I've installed this airport produced and sold by Wilco, Just Flight, Simflyers and a host of freeware developers. As I stated, IMO the scenery is somewhat mundane. I come to this opinion by actually flying there more than 40 to 60 times, and comparing it to KDEN, KSFO, KEWR, KJFK, KIAH, KLAS, KDFW, KEWR, KORD, KPHL, KSLC, KSEA, KMIA, KPDX and other airport.
I'm done with this . . . .