I just thought you may offer a separate download option like FlightBeam do with KDEN. I would watch them very closely if I was you as I am sure that is the way to go.
As I've said, our goal is to make an airport matching the real world as close as possible. You can't possibly expect we would make different variations of it, just to match other 3rd party products which, by definition, are less realistic, because they ARE generic.
I might understand a request to match a 3rd party *photoreal* scenery, especially one that was already on the market BEFORE we made the airports, but downgrading the scenery to match a generic product which has been released after, it's just wrong: will it ever end ? Should we make multiple variations for each of the texture replacement products out there ?
Obviously not: we just make it with textures/colors taken from real world, if other products don't blend well with it, it means they are not accurate for this specific area, which is the general issue with a generic "global" product. You really shouldn't expect that such products would prevent the need to use everything else: if you really care about an area and want a more realistic representation of it, outside the airport perimeter, it would be best using a photoreal scenery.